According to @lookonchain, whale address 0x12d0 sold 4,708 ETH for about $18.8M after a two-month hold, realizing a $2.67M loss; source: @lookonchain post dated 2025-10-24 and Arkham Intelligence explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x12d0D806f57Ce7DdDFf03e17Aa2318ACB0B5F5e8. Based on those reported figures, the sale implies an average exit price near $3,992 per ETH and an estimated cost basis around $4,559 per ETH, which traders can verify against the referenced on-chain record; source: @lookonchain and Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x12d0D806f57Ce7DdDFf03e17Aa2318ACB0B5F5e8.

According to @EmberCN, a trader chased ETH at 4,402 dollars for 8,637 ETH on Oct 2 and cut at 3,764 dollars on Oct 11, implying about 5.51 million dollars realized loss based on those sizes and prices; Source: @EmberCN on X, Oct 22, 2025. On Oct 13, the same trader re-entered 7,817 ETH at 4,159 dollars and exited at 3,714 dollars on Oct 17 for about 3.48 million dollars realized loss by the same calculation; Source: @EmberCN on X, Oct 22, 2025. On Oct 21, he bought 7,221 ETH at 4,036 dollars, and with ETH at 3,840 dollars afterward the position shows roughly 1.41 million dollars unrealized loss, aligning with the 1.4 million dollars figure noted; Source: @EmberCN on X, Oct 22, 2025. The post describes this activity as a contrarian signal and is tagged with #OKX, highlighting short-term trading behavior on a major exchange; Source: @EmberCN on X, Oct 22, 2025.

According to Lookonchain, six hacker-linked wallets panic-sold 7,816 ETH for $29.14M at an average execution price of $3,728 during the latest market drop, realizing an additional $3.37M loss, source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 18, 2025. According to Lookonchain, the aggregate realized loss across these six wallets has now exceeded $13.4M from buying high and selling low on ETH, source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 18, 2025. According to Lookonchain, the reported sell level of $3,728 and tranche size of 7,816 ETH offer precise flow data that traders can reference for recent ETH order flow context, source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 18, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a wallet labeled by the source as a hacker fully exited 4,190 ETH in the last 15 minutes at an average sell price of $3,840.47 versus an average cost of $3,903.68, realizing an additional loss of about $264,000 based on the cited on-chain activity. According to @ai_9684xtpa, this closes the Oct 13–today ETH swing with $3.511 million in realized losses for the wallet, with cumulative October ETH trading losses reaching $8.88 million, referencing Arkham Intelligence addresses 0x5D5363E7A6765aE22b67d9DD1F8603d1416aA5DA and 0x4dD77044ECDf6aeEeac87a3363d7C8C0ff0aEc63 as the data source. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the sale included size added last night, indicating a full unwind of the ETH position as observed on-chain.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an unknown hacker wallet that received funds on March 28 has realized cumulative ETH trading losses exceeding $8.617 million since October based on on-chain tracing (source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence). The address panic-sold 8,637 ETH on 10/11, booking about $5.37 million in realized losses (source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence). On Oct 17, the same wallet sold 7,817 ETH at an average price of $3,733 with a reported average cost basis of $4,148.95, realizing approximately $3.247 million in additional losses (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Roughly one hour later, the wallet repurchased 2,815 ETH around $3,783, indicating rapid round-trip flows at these price levels (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Traders can monitor the referenced Arkham Intelligence wallet addresses for further large ETH flows near the $3,700–$3,800 zone to inform short-term positioning and risk controls (source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence).

According to @EmberCN, an ETH whale sold 7,818 ETH at 3,714 on Oct 17 after buying roughly 7,817 to 7,818 ETH at 4,159 on Oct 13, realizing about 3.473 million USD in losses, with the related wallets and flows viewable on Arkham Intelligence explorer. According to @EmberCN, the same wallet previously bought 8,637 ETH at a 4,402 average on Oct 2 and capitulated at 3,764 on Oct 11 for a 5.506 million USD realized loss, corroborated by the Arkham Intelligence explorer addresses cited. According to @EmberCN, across both rounds the wallet’s capital fell from 38.017 million DAI to 29.038 million DAI, totaling an 8.979 million USD drawdown based on on-chain data referenced on Arkham Intelligence.

According to @OnchainLens, trader James was partially liquidated again on a 10x $PEPE long, realizing a $42,222 loss while still holding an $80.6K unrealized loss. According to @OnchainLens, the update references the wallet via CoinMarketMan HyperTracker and indicates the leveraged $PEPE long remains open and under drawdown.

According to @EmberCN, an ETH whale bought 8,637 ETH at $4,402 using 38.017M DAI nine days ago and fully exited at $3,764 today for 32.511M DAI, locking in a $5.506M realized loss, source: @EmberCN on X and Arkham Intelligence. The transactions are attributed to addresses 0x5Edf5716CEbA7a7e8aD9a2a43c491b2A429193ae, 0x1c453fd449356e07661372859B7D6A6591987F72, and 0xA0168e235ac6F2b9FCA3d2f2e8461785B89faCb6, confirming a complete round-trip from DAI to ETH and back to DAI during today’s decline, source: Arkham Intelligence and @EmberCN on X.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, BSC wallet 0x67b...09049 accumulated about 9.1 million tokens for $38,200 at $0.00419 when the token’s market cap was roughly $4.19M, then capitulated at $0.00145 for about $13,200, realizing a ~$25,000 loss near -65 percent, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X; wallet data: debot.ai address page. According to @ai_9684xtpa, those same tokens were worth around $1.65M at today’s peak, implying roughly a 43x move from the entry price and underscoring whipsaw risk in BSC microcaps for traders, source: @ai_9684xtpa on X.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a frequent Binance Smart Money leaderboard trader nicknamed George closed his ETH long around 14:00 after two days of unexpected volatility, realizing a $3.54M loss and giving back nearly 80% of prior profits; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X and the referenced Binance Smart Money profile. The long was initiated on Sep 15 at a $4,497 average entry and scaled to a maximum 9,229.77 ETH position, approximately $41.5M notional, before being fully exited today; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X and the referenced Binance Smart Money profile. Post-exit, the account’s remaining cumulative profit is about $407k, confirming a substantial PnL drawdown from peak levels; source: @ai_9684xtpa on X and the referenced Binance Smart Money profile.

According to @lookonchain, Solana wallet BV2gzZ sold 307.27M $PUMP for roughly $1.73M at an average price of $0.00564 about three hours ago, citing the linked Solscan address BV2gzZ3KVBdUDke1bMYQ3F9fAS6cPhGJKahzKcPGvEYV. According to @lookonchain, the same wallet acquired the identical 307.27M $PUMP nine days earlier for approximately $2.31M at an average price of $0.00753, implying a realized loss of about $582K (~25.2%) based on those reported figures. According to @lookonchain and the referenced Solscan records, this realized-loss distribution by a single whale is a notable on-chain flow that traders monitor for near-term liquidity and volatility in $PUMP.

According to Lookonchain, two wallets, likely tied to the same whale, sold 3,690 ETH worth about 15.6 million dollars that they had purchased the day before amid the latest price drop, based on on-chain transaction traces. Source: Lookonchain on X, Sep 4, 2025. The addresses realized a loss of approximately 944,000 dollars on the quick round-trip trades, signaling reactive selling captured via wallet-level data. Source: Lookonchain on X, Sep 4, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet address 0x9725...c1776 sold 2,525.3 ETH via CowSwap at around $4,288 per ETH about 9 hours ago during a market drawdown, totaling roughly $10.84 million (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X, Sep 2, 2025). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the address previously bought 2,541 ETH on Aug. 22 at an average price of $4,630 for about $11.77 million and fully exited roughly 10 days later, realizing an estimated $864,000 loss on the position (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X). According to @ai_9684xtpa, the post provides the truncated wallet 0x9725...c1776 and transaction context, allowing traders to verify the on-chain flow and timing of the sell during the broader market decline (source: @ai_9684xtpa on X).

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0xa523 closed a 31,559 ETH long position valued at $137.69M at a loss as ETH declined, while retaining a 55,286 ETH long worth $240.65M, with total realized losses of about $22M (source: Lookonchain on X, Aug 29, 2025). According to @lookonchain, the wallet trimmed its ETH long exposure from approximately 86,845 ETH to 55,286 ETH, a reduction of roughly 36%, based on the reported figures (source: Lookonchain on X, Aug 29, 2025; calculation based on Lookonchain data).

According to @OnchainLens, a whale with a 20x short on ETH sold some ETH to add margin in an effort to avoid liquidation, source: Onchain Lens tweet dated 2025-08-14 at twitter.com/OnchainLens/status/1955822917868249237. According to @OnchainLens, the position shows USD 9.88 million realized loss and about USD 18 million unrealized loss, corroborated by the referenced trader page at hyperdash.info/trader/0x8c586..., source: Onchain Lens tweet and Hyperdash trader page at hyperdash.info/trader/0x8c586....

According to @ArkhamIntel, whale address 0xfe0 deposited 1,054 ETH, valued at approximately $2.65 million, to Binance just 2 hours ago. The ETH was accumulated over the past year at an average entry price of $3,340. This deposit, if sold, would realize a loss of about $870,000 with a negative ROI of -25% (source: Arkham Intel). Such large-scale selling at a loss may indicate bearish sentiment among major holders and could increase short-term downward pressure on ETH prices. Traders should monitor Binance inflows and whale activity for further volatility signals.

According to The Data Nerd on Twitter, whale address BwsWU accumulated 443,700 $TRUMP tokens last month at an average price of $14.34, totaling approximately $6.34 million (source: @OnchainDataNerd, June 5, 2025). Four hours ago, the whale sold 57,800 $SOL for $624,000, realizing a loss of about $205,000. The wallet currently holds 370,400 $TRUMP, valued at $4.01 million, with an unrealized loss of roughly $1.31 million. These significant realized and unrealized losses may signal increasing sell pressure and heightened risk for $TRUMP holders, with potential short-term volatility impacting crypto trading strategies. Full wallet details are available at intel.arkm.com/explorer/address (source: @OnchainDataNerd).

According to The Data Nerd on Twitter, whale address 0x016 deposited 1,130 ETH (valued at approximately $2.05 million) to Binance just one hour ago. This whale originally accumulated the ETH three months prior at a total cost of $3.62 million. If he sells at current prices, the realized loss would be about $1.57 million, or -43.37% ROI (source: @OnchainDataNerd). This significant loss highlights potential bearish sentiment and could indicate short-term sell pressure on ETH, which is relevant for traders monitoring large on-chain movements and possible price impacts.

According to The Data Nerd, a whale identified as 7X6Vu sold 427,600 $TRUMP tokens for $4.9 million, realizing a net loss of $760,000. The tokens were purchased the previous week at an average entry price of $13.47. This significant liquidation event highlights bearish sentiment and potential price pressure for $TRUMP, serving as a cautionary signal for traders monitoring large wallet activity and liquidity trends (source: The Data Nerd on Twitter).

According to @EmberCN on Twitter, a crypto whale who shorted 8,000 ETH at an average price of $1,752.5 two days ago has fully closed the position within the last 20 minutes by buying back all 8,000 ETH at $1,778.5, resulting in a realized loss of $208,000. This real-time trading activity highlights the risk of shorting ETH amid recent price volatility. Traders should monitor whale actions and ETH price movements closely for potential impact on market liquidity and short-term price trends (Source: @EmberCN, Twitter, April 25, 2025).