According to Onchain Lens, the Unknown Whale fully closed a 25x ETH long from wallet 0x95815f5bff16eb361dab6ad6a5535698114a0605, realizing a $2.76M loss and withdrawing funds from HyperLiquid; source: Onchain Lens on X (Nov 15, 2025) and hyperbot.network/trader/0x95815f5bff16eb361dab6ad6a5535698114a0605. According to Onchain Lens, the whale still holds BTC and ETH in main wallet 0x93c841b243178bb0584d9d688b7f6cd5143c5a5e with an unrealized loss of $2.87M; source: Onchain Lens on X and hyperbot.network/trader/0x93c841b243178bb0584d9d688b7f6cd5143c5a5e. According to Onchain Lens, this reduces the whale’s leveraged ETH exposure on HyperLiquid and leaves directional risk concentrated in remaining BTC and ETH holdings, a flow setup traders monitor for cross-asset moves; source: Onchain Lens on X and the above hyperbot network pages.

According to @lookonchain, on-chain wallet 4YaiAn sold 60,001 SOL for about $8.64 million after buying the position three months ago, locking in an estimated $3.3 million realized loss, or -28% (source: @lookonchain; corroborated by Arkham Intel address data). Based on these reported figures, the position implies an entry near $200 per SOL, and the sale plus loss attribution are directly traceable via the 4YaiAn address on Arkham Intel (source: @lookonchain; Arkham Intel).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0x69b...0e378 sold 1,300 ETH about 10 minutes before the post, realizing a loss of $597,000. Source: @ai_9684xtpa post on X. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the same wallet accumulated 2,655 ETH at an average entry of $3,805.6 during Oct 14–18, leaving 1,355 ETH still held. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x69b590d9d761b396Db4465F3Dee34d43Afa0e378. Based on the disclosed cost basis and realized loss, the implied sale price for the 1,300 ETH is approximately $3,346 per ETH. Source: calculation derived from @ai_9684xtpa figures. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the remaining 1,355 ETH shows an unrealized loss of $487,000, after previously reaching peak unrealized gains of $2.142 million at the local high. Source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence explorer link above. Traders can track further flows from wallet 0x69b...0e378 for potential supply overhang and execution patterns directly on Arkham’s address page. Source: Arkham Intelligence explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x69b590d9d761b396Db4465F3Dee34d43Afa0e378.

According to @OnchainLens, a whale deposited 500 BTC valued at approximately $52.8 million into Gate after holding for four months, with activity tied to address bc1p9sdhnsryqz6hkmkrmgw0nyy9agtdaqd9fxd648g26pkn5aptj6kssks582; source: @OnchainLens on X, Nov 11, 2025. The same address previously withdrew the 500 BTC at an estimated value of $59.4 million, implying a reported realized loss of $6.85 million on the round trip; source: @OnchainLens on X, Nov 11, 2025. Based on the reported figures, the movement reflects roughly an 11.5% drawdown and a net exchange inflow of 500 BTC to Gate; source: @OnchainLens on X, Nov 11, 2025. The implied average entry was about $118,800 per BTC versus an implied current deposit valuation near $105,600 per BTC, derived from the amounts reported; source: @OnchainLens on X, Nov 11, 2025.

According to @lookonchain, wallet trader gud.hl purchased 256,000 UNI for about $2.4 million roughly six hours earlier and exited around 30 minutes ago with a realized loss of $69,400, implying an average entry near $9.38 per UNI based on the reported figures, source: Lookonchain on X twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1988108848042045754; DeBank wallet history debank.com/profile/0x4f12b217aa59e6d3e1f91ca2dc96f9543576618b/history. The same source states the address has flipped into a 10x leveraged short on UNI that is currently showing an unrealized loss of about $8,500, underscoring the FOMO risk highlighted by Lookonchain and indicating price moved against the short in the very short term, source: Lookonchain on X twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1988108848042045754; DeBank wallet history debank.com/profile/0x4f12b217aa59e6d3e1f91ca2dc96f9543576618b/history.

According to the source, long-term holders sold 400,000 BTC over the past 30 days as BTC price fell to 104,000 dollars, while short-term holders realized approximately 3 billion dollars in losses; source: public social media post dated Nov 4, 2025. The post includes no accompanying dataset or chart for independent verification, so traders should treat these figures as unverified and seek confirmation from primary on-chain data providers before acting; source: same public social media post.

According to @lookonchain, Ethereum whale wallet 0x1b57 sold 5,570 ETH worth $19.56M on Nov 4, 2025, closing a position opened five days earlier with a realized loss of $2.15M (source: @lookonchain). According to @lookonchain, the trader attempted to catch the bottom but failed, and the wallet address was referenced via Arkham Intel for on-chain verification (source: @lookonchain).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an address labeled as an “unknown hacker” opened 7,126.74 ETH at a $4,020 cost on Oct 22, 2025 (source: @ai_9684xtpa; on-chain: explorer.cow.fi/address/0x562ded8c95C2E04D4363305cc7DbCAAce2583c61). The same address sold 2,655 ETH at $3,740.78 during the Oct 31 drawdown, realizing a $758,000 loss (source: @ai_9684xtpa; on-chain: explorer.cow.fi/address/0x562ded8c95C2E04D4363305cc7DbCAAce2583c61). On Nov 4, it sold another 2,243 ETH at $3,576.64, realizing a further $994,000 loss (source: @ai_9684xtpa; on-chain: explorer.cow.fi/address/0x562ded8c95C2E04D4363305cc7DbCAAce2583c61). The wallet retains 2,228.74 ETH with an unrealized loss of $832,000, bringing realized losses to $1.75 million and total drawdown to about $2.58 million based on the figures provided (source: @ai_9684xtpa; on-chain: explorer.cow.fi/address/0x562ded8c95C2E04D4363305cc7DbCAAce2583c61). The author added this wallet to a counter-indicator list for tracking reactive sell behavior during volatility (source: @ai_9684xtpa).

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a large whale fully closed a 1,210.02 BTC long roughly 7 hours ago with a realized loss of $5.296 million, citing a total position size near $133 million, source: x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1985482672144334998. The same source reports the whale continues to hold ETH, SOL, and HYPE longs with remaining exposure valued around $148 million and an unrealized loss of $18.2 million, source: x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1985482672144334998 and hyperbot.network/trader/0xc2a30212a8DdAc9e123944d6e29FADdCe994E5f2. After the BTC exit, an address labeled as an insider opened new long positions attempting to buy the dip, source: x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1985482672144334998 and hyperbot.network/trader/0xc2a30212a8DdAc9e123944d6e29FADdCe994E5f2. Traders tracking this wallet can monitor further entries and exits via the on-chain dashboard to assess positioning shifts across BTC, ETH, and SOL, source: hyperbot.network/trader/0xc2a30212a8DdAc9e123944d6e29FADdCe994E5f2.

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x2fcf spent about $6M over the past month accumulating memecoins including $币安人生, $客服小何, $PING, $PUP, meme rush, and $T4; source: Lookonchain (X post dated Nov 3, 2025) and DeBank profile debank.com/profile/0x2fcfd3aa4ba87c6aa14c9928c17f6aa3652224fa. According to @lookonchain, the trader sold all positions roughly one hour before the post, realizing approximately $4M in losses; source: Lookonchain. According to @lookonchain, the reported realized losses by token were $2.49M on $币安人生, $915K on $客服小何, $377K on $PING, $115K on $PUP, $90K on meme rush, and $11K on $T4; source: Lookonchain.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, wallet 0x24892cFAab12D98B23ffa00bcaca4999C7187976 sold 1,531 ETH at $3,691 per ETH about 7 hours ago, a notional of roughly $5.65M. Source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1984091387454009487 According to @ai_9684xtpa, the reported cost basis was $4,094 per ETH with a holding period of around two weeks, implying an estimated realized loss of about $617,000. Source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1984091387454009487 Arkham Intelligence shows the referenced address activity and on-chain details for verification. Source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x24892cFAab12D98B23ffa00bcaca4999C7187976 According to @ai_9684xtpa, the trader is characterized as a swing trader who has repeatedly bought high and sold low, and this sale was described as near a short-term low. Source: https://x.com/ai_9684xtpa/status/1984091387454009487

According to @lookonchain, wallet 0x5509 sold 10,000 ETH for about $39.11M as the market fell, realizing a $7.5M loss; source: X post on Oct 30, 2025 https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1983793537838920125. According to @lookonchain, the ETH was accumulated roughly two months earlier and the address and transfers can be verified on Arkham Intel; source: https://intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x5509869f537ddD37b8D2c3e0aC2E882CdfA881E4. According to @lookonchain, the transaction reflects a whale panic-sell during downside pressure, indicating realized-loss distribution from a large holder; source: X post on Oct 30, 2025 https://twitter.com/lookonchain/status/1983793537838920125.

According to @lookonchain, whale address 0x12d0 sold 4,708 ETH for about $18.8M after a two-month hold, realizing a $2.67M loss; source: @lookonchain post dated 2025-10-24 and Arkham Intelligence explorer intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x12d0D806f57Ce7DdDFf03e17Aa2318ACB0B5F5e8. Based on those reported figures, the sale implies an average exit price near $3,992 per ETH and an estimated cost basis around $4,559 per ETH, which traders can verify against the referenced on-chain record; source: @lookonchain and Arkham Intelligence intel.arkm.com/explorer/address/0x12d0D806f57Ce7DdDFf03e17Aa2318ACB0B5F5e8.

According to @EmberCN, a trader chased ETH at 4,402 dollars for 8,637 ETH on Oct 2 and cut at 3,764 dollars on Oct 11, implying about 5.51 million dollars realized loss based on those sizes and prices; Source: @EmberCN on X, Oct 22, 2025. On Oct 13, the same trader re-entered 7,817 ETH at 4,159 dollars and exited at 3,714 dollars on Oct 17 for about 3.48 million dollars realized loss by the same calculation; Source: @EmberCN on X, Oct 22, 2025. On Oct 21, he bought 7,221 ETH at 4,036 dollars, and with ETH at 3,840 dollars afterward the position shows roughly 1.41 million dollars unrealized loss, aligning with the 1.4 million dollars figure noted; Source: @EmberCN on X, Oct 22, 2025. The post describes this activity as a contrarian signal and is tagged with #OKX, highlighting short-term trading behavior on a major exchange; Source: @EmberCN on X, Oct 22, 2025.

According to Lookonchain, six hacker-linked wallets panic-sold 7,816 ETH for $29.14M at an average execution price of $3,728 during the latest market drop, realizing an additional $3.37M loss, source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 18, 2025. According to Lookonchain, the aggregate realized loss across these six wallets has now exceeded $13.4M from buying high and selling low on ETH, source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 18, 2025. According to Lookonchain, the reported sell level of $3,728 and tranche size of 7,816 ETH offer precise flow data that traders can reference for recent ETH order flow context, source: Lookonchain on X, Oct 18, 2025.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, a wallet labeled by the source as a hacker fully exited 4,190 ETH in the last 15 minutes at an average sell price of $3,840.47 versus an average cost of $3,903.68, realizing an additional loss of about $264,000 based on the cited on-chain activity. According to @ai_9684xtpa, this closes the Oct 13–today ETH swing with $3.511 million in realized losses for the wallet, with cumulative October ETH trading losses reaching $8.88 million, referencing Arkham Intelligence addresses 0x5D5363E7A6765aE22b67d9DD1F8603d1416aA5DA and 0x4dD77044ECDf6aeEeac87a3363d7C8C0ff0aEc63 as the data source. According to @ai_9684xtpa, the sale included size added last night, indicating a full unwind of the ETH position as observed on-chain.

According to @ai_9684xtpa, an unknown hacker wallet that received funds on March 28 has realized cumulative ETH trading losses exceeding $8.617 million since October based on on-chain tracing (source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence). The address panic-sold 8,637 ETH on 10/11, booking about $5.37 million in realized losses (source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence). On Oct 17, the same wallet sold 7,817 ETH at an average price of $3,733 with a reported average cost basis of $4,148.95, realizing approximately $3.247 million in additional losses (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Roughly one hour later, the wallet repurchased 2,815 ETH around $3,783, indicating rapid round-trip flows at these price levels (source: @ai_9684xtpa). Traders can monitor the referenced Arkham Intelligence wallet addresses for further large ETH flows near the $3,700–$3,800 zone to inform short-term positioning and risk controls (source: @ai_9684xtpa; Arkham Intelligence).

According to @EmberCN, an ETH whale sold 7,818 ETH at 3,714 on Oct 17 after buying roughly 7,817 to 7,818 ETH at 4,159 on Oct 13, realizing about 3.473 million USD in losses, with the related wallets and flows viewable on Arkham Intelligence explorer. According to @EmberCN, the same wallet previously bought 8,637 ETH at a 4,402 average on Oct 2 and capitulated at 3,764 on Oct 11 for a 5.506 million USD realized loss, corroborated by the Arkham Intelligence explorer addresses cited. According to @EmberCN, across both rounds the wallet’s capital fell from 38.017 million DAI to 29.038 million DAI, totaling an 8.979 million USD drawdown based on on-chain data referenced on Arkham Intelligence.

According to @OnchainLens, trader James was partially liquidated again on a 10x $PEPE long, realizing a $42,222 loss while still holding an $80.6K unrealized loss. According to @OnchainLens, the update references the wallet via CoinMarketMan HyperTracker and indicates the leveraged $PEPE long remains open and under drawdown.

According to @EmberCN, an ETH whale bought 8,637 ETH at $4,402 using 38.017M DAI nine days ago and fully exited at $3,764 today for 32.511M DAI, locking in a $5.506M realized loss, source: @EmberCN on X and Arkham Intelligence. The transactions are attributed to addresses 0x5Edf5716CEbA7a7e8aD9a2a43c491b2A429193ae, 0x1c453fd449356e07661372859B7D6A6591987F72, and 0xA0168e235ac6F2b9FCA3d2f2e8461785B89faCb6, confirming a complete round-trip from DAI to ETH and back to DAI during today’s decline, source: Arkham Intelligence and @EmberCN on X.